Why I won't be buying a Kindle
Nov. 21st, 2007 08:50 amI've been chasing the specter of a good e-book reader for several years, and I've checked out a number of them. All have had their faults, mostly in contrast and readability, up to this point. Lord knows I tried reading books on a Palm device, but the page size is just too small. I've read a number of books and magazines on my laptop, and it's okay, but not exactly a "take a book to the park and read" item. However, the new e-paper technology has shown a lot of promise, having high contrast, a paper-white background without need for a backlight in most situations, and a far less gluttonous need for electricity. I looked longingly at the Sony Reader, but its first-generation aura and Windows-only connectivity kept me from diving in, though I've long had a tendency towards bleeding-edge technology adoption (I have yet to check out the second-generation Sony PRS-505, but it's still Windows-only). When I heard about Amazon's Kindle, I was excited, thinking to myself that perhaps this time somebody's gotten it right. Unfortunately, Amazon has not designed PDF support into the Kindle, which makes it a no-go for me. You see, I already have a large collection of e-books, almost all in PDF, as well as my subscriptions to the electronic versions of Asimov's, F&SF, and Analog, also in PDF. I'm not about to buy a reader that doesn't support books I already have.
Though it's not surprising that Amazon made the decision to go with a proprietary format, making Amazon's online e-book service the only source for material, I think that's extremely short-sighted. Every other e-book reader that's taken that path has disappeared from the market fairly quickly. While I understand the appeal from a profit-making angle ("and once they've bought the reader, they have to buy all their books from us"), people who are interested in e-books are likely to already have some, most likely in PDF or in the DRM-laden Palm Reader and Mobi formats, and will be unlikely to dive into a reader that force them to repurchase books they already have. Oh, sure, the Kindle supports HTML, .doc files, and ACSII text files, but those aren't used for e-book releases unless you get all your reading material from Project Gutenberg. Now supposedly the Kindle is Linux based, which means that somebody may get in there and provide a hack for PDF support, but until they do, I'll still be lugging either paper or my laptop around with me.
Though it's not surprising that Amazon made the decision to go with a proprietary format, making Amazon's online e-book service the only source for material, I think that's extremely short-sighted. Every other e-book reader that's taken that path has disappeared from the market fairly quickly. While I understand the appeal from a profit-making angle ("and once they've bought the reader, they have to buy all their books from us"), people who are interested in e-books are likely to already have some, most likely in PDF or in the DRM-laden Palm Reader and Mobi formats, and will be unlikely to dive into a reader that force them to repurchase books they already have. Oh, sure, the Kindle supports HTML, .doc files, and ACSII text files, but those aren't used for e-book releases unless you get all your reading material from Project Gutenberg. Now supposedly the Kindle is Linux based, which means that somebody may get in there and provide a hack for PDF support, but until they do, I'll still be lugging either paper or my laptop around with me.